All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the Defendant 1’s crime No. 1 as indicated in the lower judgment, the Defendant did not intentionally pay a traffic accident, but did not exaggeration the injury as he received hospitalized treatment due to the need for hospitalized treatment.

In relation to the crime No. 2 of the facts stated in the judgment below, the defendant was actually involved in an actual traffic accident, and some of them do not face the defendant's arms.

B. In relation to the part of not guilty in the judgment of the court below, the judgment below which acquitted the defendant, although the crime of this case was committed intentionally by the defendant, or obtained the insurance money by infusing the injury, is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles.

B. The sentence of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below on the basis of unreasonable sentencing is too unhued and unfair.

2. Determination

A. (1) The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and admitted by the court below as to the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts in the facts stated in the judgment of the court below, namely, each of the above traffic accidents is minor, and the Defendant was towed at the time of each traffic accident or was faced with an accident serious to the extent that the Defendant would have sent to the hospital after having taken care of the emergency vehicle. Nevertheless, the Defendant received hospital treatment after the occurrence of each of the above traffic accidents, the Defendant did not find any circumstances requiring the Defendant’s hospital treatment because there were any particular findings of the medical treatment and the result of the inspection conducted at each of the above hospitals, and there was no circumstance requiring the Defendant’s hospital treatment. In the case of the accident Nos. 3 and 5 in the table 1, the Defendant was hospitalized after the accident, according to whether the Defendant was hospitalized at the hospital after the accident, the Defendant operated a taxi during the above hospital. However, the Defendant’s monthly salary was set at the same time.