Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The Defendant is a natural-generating relative organization organized by RC 19 years old descendants in the middle of the aforesaid “S” as the middle of the city with the aim of protecting the graves of joint ancestor aid and promoting friendship among their specifications, and the Plaintiff is the head of the Defendant’s family.
The “S” established “T” and “U” as the 22-year-old hand, and adopted “T” as the 23-year-old hand V, the arche of “U,” due to the lack of children.
The Defendant has participated as a clan member by the descendants of “T” (hereinafter referred to as “Tm”) and the descendants of “U” (hereinafter referred to as “Umm”).
On January 9, 2017, the court rendered a decision to permit the convening of an extraordinary general meeting at the request of Defendant Jong-won (the Daejeon District Court 2016 non-conforming82). Accordingly, from the extraordinary general meeting held on February 4, 2017 (hereinafter “instant extraordinary meeting”), there was a resolution to appoint O, P, and Q as the chairperson of the Defendant, and as the vice-chairperson, D as the chairperson of the Defendant: (a) as a director, E, F, G, H, I, K, K, L, and auditor; (b) M, N as an advisor, as an adviser (hereinafter “instant resolution”).
[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, there is a defect in Gap 2, 3, 7 and Eul 6 and 11 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and in the notice of convening the special meeting of this case, there is a defect in the notification of convening the special meeting of this case, even if following the defendant's argument, since the defendant's assertion was made, 613 members of the defendant's family members at the time of the resolution of this case.
In addition, there is a defect in the written decision to convene the special meeting in light of the fact that there is no circumstance to propose the convocation of the special meeting of this case among the applicants, WW 2 among the applicants, and X did not seem to have been in the situation to propose the convocation of the special meeting of this case during the time enlisted in C. In the instant special meeting, only the resolution of this case was adopted at the general meeting of this case as Speaker pro tempore, but theO did not attend the instant special meeting, and there is evidence to prove that the instant special meeting was actually in fact.