Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B: 2 real estate listed in the Appendix 1 List;
B. Defendant C is among the 2 real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.
Reasons
1. Claim against Defendant K
(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;
(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act;
2. Each claim against the remaining Defendants
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association established to carry out a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) with the area of project district of 103,429m2 of the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon as the project district. 2) The head of the Dong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City approved the Plaintiff’s management and disposal plan on February 26, 2018, and announced it on the same day.
(3) Defendant B, D, E, F, G, H, I, and L (hereinafter “Defendant B, etc.”) are the owners of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 in the Plaintiff’s project implementation district, which falls under each subparagraph of paragraph (1) of the order among the real estate in the Plaintiff’s real estate located in the Plaintiff’s project implementation district (hereinafter “instant real estate”). Defendant C was subject to cash settlement due to failing to file an application for parcelling-out in the public announcement of the Plaintiff’s application for parcelling-out. Defendant C is the tenants possessing each part among the two real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the separate sheet No. 2, and Defendant J is the tenants possessing each part among the 12 real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the separate sheet No. 3 (hereinafter “instant occupied part”). The Plaintiff filed an application for expropriation with the local Land Tribunal of Daejeon Metropolitan City, which did not reach an agreement on the compensation for losses, and the aforementioned local Land Tribunal accepted the pertinent real estate as the date of expropriation on October 12, 2018, etc.
5) From November 6, 2018 to November 9, 2011, the Plaintiff deposited each of the instant compensation for losses for Defendant B, etc., respectively. [Grounds for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 13 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings.