logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.21 2015노1689
상해치사등
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the defendant asserts that the defendant's imprisonment with labor (ten years of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of this case is also significant in that the defendant committed an act of inflicting injury on the victim F, who is one's wife, threatening him to a dangerous object three times, and then brought about the victim's death by reconcing the victim's body behind it. In order to avoid this, the defendant concealed the victim's body in the back of the office to conceal it, and then stolen the victim's smartphone in the course of escape, which is a theft of the victim's smartphone, the frequency of the crime is high, the nature of each crime, and the circumstances of the crime, and as long as it cannot change what is, the result is very serious in that it infringes on the victim's life.

The victim F was suffering from each crime of injury and intimidation, resulting in death by the crime of bodily or mental pain, and the victim F was suffering from serious suffering, and the victim's bereaved family members, including children, are also unable to recover.

Therefore, the bereaved family members and the branch members of the victim F want to be punished for a severe punishment for the defendant over several times until the trial is in trial, and the defendant is not receiving a letter from the bereaved family members of the victim including his/her own children.

In addition, even though the defendant has been punished several times due to robbery, injury, etc., he again committed the crime of this case.

These circumstances are disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case, and misunderstandings in depth, and the crime of death resulting in bodily injury in this case occurred as well as the defendant and the victim F together with the victim F, by somewhat contingent circumstances. The defendant's bereaved family members of the victim F are children of the victim F.

arrow