Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed a dispute with the victim E (here, 59 years of age) who won the building name lawsuit in Goyang-gu, Yongsan-gu; (b) claimed that the victim E (here, her 59 years of age did not receive any key; (c) brought a dispute with the Defendant; (d) brought the victim’s right side and face; and (e) went beyond the victim’s locking the victim, and caused the victim to go beyond the victim, and caused the victim to go beyond the victim to undergo approximately three-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Damage photographs (According to the above adopted evidence, the victim E has a red himself/herself on the face on the photograph taken at the police station on the day of the instant case, and the victim was issued a medical certificate after being given medical treatment to the hospital immediately following the occurrence of the instant case, and the victim made a statement to the police officer dispatched to the instant site upon receiving the defendant's report that he/she was faced with the defendant (F's statement recognized, which conforms to the victim's statement).

The victim filed a complaint with the defendant regularly after one month from the date of the instant case, which can be seen as having received a complaint by changing the situation where only the victim did not want to have his/her right to open a house at the time of the instant case was punished as an injury to the defendant, and it is difficult to view that he/she made a false statement even though the victim did not have any right to open a house.

A witness F’s statement to the effect that the Defendant only made the victim, and that the victim did not have any dancing, was considerably wide space in the instant site, and F had the right to remove air conditioners at the site as air conditioners removal articles, and F had the right to remove air conditioners. As such, F continuedly had the right to dispute with the Defendant and the victim, it is probable that all pages do not seem to be all pages even if the Defendant and the victim did not have the right to dispute, and F in fact.