(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.15 2018고합37

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.15 2018고합37

영리약취미수등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2018 Gohap 37]

1. A special assault against the victim B was committed by the victim, and the victim was able to receive a return of the gift, which had been the subject of his/her influence, that he/she had been demanding the victim to hedging.

On July 31, 2017, around 11:50, the Defendant found the victim who was waiting for the victim in the front corridor of the victim's house located in the officetel Ctel, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim who was staying home; (b) sought both arms and descendants; and (c) led the victim to his house.

The Defendant displayed excessive restriction, which is a dangerous object in possession of the victim after the victim gets away by her grandchildren and driving away from the escape of the victim. “The victim frighted, she was frighted, she was frighted, she was frightened by the house, and she was frighted, and she was frighted, she was frighted to the victim by one hand, she was frighted by another hand, and she was forced to she was frighted to the victim into the house of the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous article in excess of the victim's right to use it.

2. The Defendant, in relation to the victim B, brought 1,50,000 won of the market value of the victim’s possession, which was the victim’s hand while francing with the victim at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, and brought 1,150,000 won of cash, credit cards, etc. to the mobile phone case.

[2018 Gohap 112]

3. On May 2017, the Defendant in violation of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit Financial Business related to the Victim D was able to teach the Victim with his/her re-performance while driving force.

A. On June 22, 2017, the Defendant does not have cash for the victim’s purchase of the Nam-gu E apartment complex in the name of the width in Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Daegu, the Busan, the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Plaintiff”) around 12:00,000.

An apartment can receive a large amount of profit if the subscription was made, but only KRW 3 million has been lent, which is to be repaid within a week.

However, the defendant is a victim.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2016.12.08 2016고합431

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.05.17 2015고합170

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.11.04 2016고단1658

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.07.18 2019고합49

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2012.04.06 2011고합123