1. The Defendants:

(a) closing the business of the restaurant listed in the separate sheet;

(b) Yangsan City by January 18, 202 and others;

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The summary of the parties’ assertion (i.e., Plaintiff’s assertion with the Defendants, a vice-party, on January 3, 2012, the Plaintiff acquired the entire business rights of “D” collection (the E location in Gyeyang City E; hereinafter “instant frequency collection”) operated by the Defendants at the time, in the acquisition price of KRW 31 million.

Nevertheless, from February 1, 2012 to December 1, 2012, the Defendants breached their contractual obligations by running the frequency of “G”’s trade name in Yangsan-si, and around December 2012, the Defendants suffered enormous damages due to the decline in the Plaintiff’s sales.

Therefore, according to the contract with the Plaintiff, the Defendants are obligated to discontinue the above I’s business and not engage in the frequency collection business until January 18, 2022. The Defendants are obligated to pay damages according to the ratio of KRW 35 million, which is the amount equivalent to KRW 31 million, which is the acquisition price, as damages for breach of contract, and KRW 150,000,000,000,000,000, which is the acquisition price, as damages for breach of contract.

See Defendant B merely agreed to sell all the facilities of the instant frequency to the Plaintiff, and did not transfer the business to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s decline in sales was due to the fact that the large active center was opened at the J of Yangsan-si, and it is not attributable to the business of the Defendants.

B. (i) Around January 3, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a verbal agreement with the Defendants, a vice-party, to the effect that the Defendants acquire all business rights of the instant frequencies operated by the Defendants.

The Defendants transferred technology, etc. for the management of the frequency to the Plaintiff under the instant contract. On January 26, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the business report by changing the frequency of the instant house from Defendant B to the Plaintiff from Defendant B to the Plaintiff.

Fidelity, from February 2012, the Defendants began to engage in the business of collecting the frequency in the name of “G frequency collection” in Yangsan City F.

x) The plaintiff is about the defendants' above G frequency collection operation.