logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.25 2015고단6282
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving the B-learning passenger car.

1. Around October 21, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.134% of blood alcohol concentration in the section of approximately 1 kilometer from around the Incheon Yeonsu-gu Incheon training Police Station to the road located in 138 as the cause of the cause of the Incheon Yeonsu-gu cafeteria, Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon.

2. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) on October 21, 2015, the Defendant sent the front road 156, which is located in the 156-ro of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, to a speed of about 30 kilometers a speed of 50 kilometers a speed, depending on one of two laness in the direction of the Doing Hospital, from the direction of the Doing Hospital.

At night, the above place was in the vicinity of the intersection that connects the four-lane road, and since the traffic of the motor vehicle is controlled by the signal apparatus and the passage of other motor vehicles is frequent, there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by properly operating the steering gear and operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, as described in Paragraph 1, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim C(52 years of age) who was waiting to turn to the left at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the negligence in the course of driving the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as stated in Paragraph 1, and was driven by the front part of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above occupational duties to inflict bodily injury on the victim, such as salt, tensions, and so on, the victim E (29), the victim F (26), the victim G (34), and the victim H (26) respectively.

arrow