logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.05.23 2013노572
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (for each of the crimes listed in the table of crimes Nos. 2, 3 and 4 attached hereto: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for each of the crimes listed in the table of crimes listed in the table of crimes listed in the table of crimes listed in the table of crimes listed in the table of crimes listed in the table of crimes listed in the table of 1, 5 and 3 to 8: 5 years) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are as follows: (a) the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case; (b) the victim F was smoothly agreed with the victim I; (c) the victim F was paid KRW 6,419,460 with the insurance money; and (d) the bereaved family members of the victim network E received KRW 82,731,750 with the victim network; and (c) each of the crimes of Articles 2, 3, and 1, and 4 in the attached crime list of crimes in the judgment of the court below as of April 29, 201; and (d) the latter concurrent crimes of Article 37 of the Criminal Act Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act with the crime of fabrication of private documents and the crime for which the judgment became final and conclusive.

However, on the other hand, the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) in the instant crime was committed by the Defendant without taking measures such as aiding and abetting the victims E or F who walk normally on the crosswalk, and the nature of the crime was very significant. The above accident resulted in a serious result that cannot be complied with due to the death of the victim E, the victim F and the bereaved family members of the network E did not reach an agreement to the trial. In particular, the victims of the network E want to be punished against the Defendant, and the vehicle operated by the Defendant was not covered by a comprehensive insurance. In addition, in the case of each of the instant crimes, the crime of forging private documents and the crime of uttering of the above investigation documents, which was committed for the purpose of towing a vehicle by gathering the identity of others without obtaining a license, and is serious in light of the motive, frequency, etc. of the crime.

arrow