logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.02.18 2018나64613
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was presented in this court and the testimony of witness D in this court, it is difficult to recognize that there was a claim for the price of goods against the defendant of the C corporation at the time when the decision of provisional seizure in this case was delivered to the defendant, and it is difficult to recognize that D, a representative of the defendant at that time, in collusion with C corporation, had falsely extinguished the above claim for the price of goods on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize that D had falsely extinguished the above claim for the collection of goods

B. Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow