The Plaintiff, Defendant Minemun Law Firm, 5,261,930 won, and Defendant Heavy Law Firm, 41,649,048 won, and each of the above.

Basic Facts

On April 29, 2011, the Central Installment Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Central Installment Savings Bank”) was declared bankrupt on February 23, 2012 by the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Hahap2, and on the same day, the Plaintiff was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy of the Central Installment Savings Bank.

The defendant Magylology is A, and the defendant Dulo is a law firm that has been in service until now.

On the one hand, the title of the title of the central savings bank A and B, and the central savings bank jointly and severally filed a claim against A and B for a payment order with respect to loans of KRW 96,468,618 and its KRW 90,000,000,000 each year from September 16, 2010 to the date of full payment, with respect to the loans of KRW 96,468,618 and its KRW 90,000,000, the part against A (hereinafter “instant payment order”) of the above payment order was finalized as it is.

B With respect to the instant payment order, the Seoul Central District Court 201Kadan10218 was dissatisfied with the instant payment order, and the said court rendered a judgment on June 23, 2011 that "the Defendant (B) shall pay 96,468,618 won to the Plaintiff (the Central Installment Savings Bank) and 90,000 won among them at the rate of 25% per annum from September 16, 2010 to the date of full payment (hereinafter "the final judgment of this case"), and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

The Plaintiff, a trustee in bankruptcy of the National Bank of Korea, based on the original copy of the seizure and collection order against the Defendants and the original copy of the instant payment order, shall be based on the Plaintiff’s executory force until KRW 184,865,878 out of the amount claimed by the obligor A to KRW 184,865,878, out of the amount of the wage claims (payment, bonuses, and other wage claims of similar nature; hereinafter the same shall apply) possessed by the obligor A against the Defendant of the third obligor, the judgment of the instant case is final and conclusive.