Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 24, 2018, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim C (person who saw in his/her own fluence) located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “D”); (b) sent the victim an excessively large voice with drinking alcohol; and (c) in such a case, the victim sent the victim a large voice with the victim “I would have another customer be able to drink, string, and to be able to be able to do so; and (d) sent the victim’s packaging work by force over approximately 30 minutes, including the instant instant cup and beerped in the table, which was put on the table.” (c) The Defendant interfered with the operation of the victim’s packaging work by force.

2. Around 22:28 on the same day as paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim F and G, a police official working at the police box called out after receiving a report at the above packing horse, are returned home to the Defendant, and that the victim F and G, who were the police officer assigned to the E box, were able to view the Defendant’s name at his wife H and place, and nine customers, who are unable to know the name of drinking alcohol at the above place, were sexually insulting to the victims, and sexually insulting the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The sentencing conditions set forth in the trial of this case, such as the fact that the defendant was subject to criminal punishment for the reasons of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and the victim C does not want to be punished against the defendant.