beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff Educational Foundation A (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff A”) established and operated the International High School, J High School, the Plaintiff Educational Foundation B (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) and the Plaintiff Educational Foundation C (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff C”) respectively, with Mhigh Schools and N High Schools, the Plaintiff Educational Foundation D (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff D”) and the Plaintiff Educational Foundation E (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff E”) with P High Schools, the Plaintiff Educational Foundation E (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff F”) with P High Schools, and the Plaintiff Educational Foundation G (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff G”) with the Plaintiff Educational Foundation G, and the Plaintiff Educational Foundation H (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff H”) with the Plaintiff High Schools, respectively.
B. On July 1, 2010, the Plaintiff A, who was appointed as the president, appointed U as the principal of the International High School and J High School. Plaintiff C, the president of the International High School from September 1, 2007 to February 29, 2008, appointed C as the principal of the M High School and the principal of the N High School on March 1, 2008. Plaintiff E, who was appointed as the principal of the X as the principal of the P High School on March 1, 2008, while X was in office as the principal of the P High School, appointed Plaintiff C as the principal of the P High School on October 5, 2008, who was in office as the principal of the P High School, and Plaintiff C was in office as the principal of the P High School on October 1, 2008, and Plaintiff G was in office as the principal of the P High School on February 3, 2009.
On the other hand, on March 1, 2007, Plaintiff B appointed AD as the principal of the K Commercial High School, and then AE, the spouse of Plaintiff B, was appointed as the chief director on August 24, 2007. Plaintiff D appointed AF on March 1, 2008 as the principal director of the Ohigh School, and Plaintiff H was appointed as the chief director on November 3, 2008 by AG, the principal of the AF, as the principal of the AF, as the principal director of the AF, on November 3, 2008. Plaintiff H appointed AH as the principal of the S High School on October 2, 2008, and the AI, the father of Plaintiff H, was appointed as the chief director on November 2, 2008.
A person who is appointed as a principal of each of the above schools.