The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes in this case and against himself/herself, and supports his/her misunderstanding.

However, it is necessary to strictly punish narcotics-related crimes not only because they avoid the body and mind of an individual due to their crypism, toxicity, etc., but also are highly likely to harm the health and social safety of the people.

Each of the crimes of this case is not only the defendant received, possessed, and administered philophones, but also the defendant intended to provide them for distribution by selling them, and the quality of the crime is not weak.

Each of the crimes of this case is a crime committed during the same period of repeated crime, and there is a large number of criminal records against the defendant, and thus, the possibility of criticism is high.

Considering the various circumstances, including the above circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.