1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The plaintiffs' assertion is the instructors who operated golf clubs in China, and D and E are students who received golf lessons from the plaintiffs, and the defendant is D and E's mother.

Around June 2008, D entered the Academy as F golf Academy golf students, and D set the amount of 28 million won as the expenses for studying in the year, from June 2008 to March 201, 201.

For 34 months, total expenses were KRW 79,220,00 and KRW 5 million for the registration of other Chinese schools, KRW 2 million for the registration of university 1 year, and KRW 1,350,000 for New Zealand.

On July 2009, E began golf study in the Faria, and in the case of E, the cost of study in the year was 24 million won, and from July 2009 to March 201, New Zealand off training was conducted.

In addition, 2.5 million won and 1.350,000 won were additionally required for the registration of Chinese schools.

E and D agreed in December 2010 that the plaintiffs and the defendant agreed on the final unpaid costs of 58.8 million won, but they did not pay it later.

The plaintiffs have claims of two million won each, and the plaintiffs B shall be paid 1.8 million won for E and D to New Zealand, and the plaintiffs B shall be paid 1.8 million won for them.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff B 38,800,000 won, 20,000,000 won, and 20% interest per annum from the day after the delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case to the day of complete payment.

2. There is no dispute between the parties that the plaintiffs caused golf lessons to D and E.

However, it is argued that the defendant was not set at 28 million won or 24 million won a year of study expenses, and that there was no agreement as 58.8 million won with the final payment expenses. Therefore, the plaintiffs should prove such facts.

However, only the document submitted by the plaintiffs (No. 7) is written.