logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2017.08.24 2017고정37
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates D (hereinafter referred to as “the instant multi-face”) located in G in Gungbuk-gun, Gungbuk-gun, and was engaged in so-called “tampet business” in a way that allows multi-party employees E (V, 36 years of age) to engage in multi-party sexual traffic and divide the price for the sexual traffic.

1. On March 5, 2016, at around 12:00, the Defendant: (a) stated that “F is good for each customer and is fine; (b)” and made E engage in so-called “temet business” by having him/her engage in so-called “temet business”; (c) received KRW 270,000 from F, a customer, from the non-f, and arranged sexual intercourse on one occasion at the time of stay at around 2:00 on the same day.

2. On March 8, 2016, at H located in G at around 13:00, the Defendant: (a) stated that “I would not salp or engage in salp business and sexual traffic”; and (b) allowed E to engage in so-called “temet business”; (c) from around 13:00 to around 17:00 of the same day, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic by receiving KRW 300,000 from I who is a customer and receiving KRW 300,000 from I to around 17:0 of the same day.

3. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) told E to “LL Na’s friendship business, tweet business and sexual traffic”; (b) let E carry on so-called “Tweet business”; (c) received KRW 300,00 from L, a customer, and arranged sexual intercourse on three occasions at around 14:00 on the same day.

4. On March 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated that “I would be good and fine for each passenger; (b) would be engaged in so-called “temet business” to E; (c) from around 21:00 to around 03:00 on March 26, 2016, the Defendant assisted E to engage in sexual traffic by receiving KRW 300,000 from I, a customer, and arranging sexual intercourse on one occasion.

Accordingly, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic four times as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses E and I, respectively.

arrow