logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.12.10 2018구단51321
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 24, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. and was in charge of management planning, cost calculation, etc. in a computer management team on February 19, 2018, and was additionally in charge of shipment management on February 19, 2018. “On March 6, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on March 29, 2019 on the ground that he/she was in charge of piling up products on a container for export, and was in charge of piling up and piling up the upper left part of the container for export (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On April 4, 2019, the Plaintiff taken the MI image of the instant injury and disease, and on April 11, 2019, the Plaintiff carried out a bitI image of the instant injury and disease, and carried out a bitI image of the instant injury and disease, with a view to an anti-crison and anti-crising around April 11, 2019.

C. On April 12, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits as the instant injury. On April 27, 2018, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “The instant injury and disease lack objective data to prove the occurrence of the instant accident, and on the grounds that “the instant injury and disease are a chronic opinion with which acute opinions are not observed.”

D) On August 2018, the Plaintiff filed a request for review, but the Defendant dismissed the said request for review on or around August 2018, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee dismissed the said request for review on November 16, 2018. [In the event there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the purport of the aforementioned request for review is as follows: (a) No. 3, No. 4, No. 12, No. 1, No. 2, and No. 12, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury of this case occurred due to the sudden changes in the work in the workplace, or the sudden damage caused by the use of the unreasonable shoulder while performing the work of 25 to 35 km heavy goods heading, or a change in the general escape according to age.

arrow