logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.03.11 2014가단25701
배당이의
Text

1. As to the distribution case E in the Ulsan District Court, the above court against Defendant B out of the distribution schedule prepared on September 19, 2014.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant B’s commission on January 12, 2012, which states that “F shall pay to Defendant B an annual interest of 20% per annum of KRW 15,000,000 on the payment date on April 18, 2012” as the document No. 107 of the No. 2012, stating that “F shall pay to Defendant B the said interest on the said payment date, and the Plaintiff shall jointly and severally guarantee the payment within the limit of KRW 20,000,000, and if not, accept compulsory execution” (hereinafter referred to as “No. 1 authentic deed”).

2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit of demurrer against the Defendant on the ground that the No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 36141 did not request the preparation of the No. 1 notarial deed, on the ground that the Plaintiff did not request the preparation of the No. 1 notarial deed, and that the No. 1 notarial deed was null and void, the Plaintiff appealed against the Defendant, but the Defendant did not request the preparation of the No. 1 notarial deed, and that the No. 1 notarial deed was null and void.

3) Defendant B had No. 1 notarial deed; Defendant C had a notary public’s notarial deed No. 1979, Nov. 9, 201, No. 1971, 201 (hereinafter “No. 2 notarial deed”).

Defendant D with a notarial deed No. 1137, 2012 (hereinafter “third notarial deed”) signed by a notary public on May 3, 2012, in the notarial deed No. 1137, 2012 (hereinafter “third notarial deed”).

(1) The non-party corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Korean corporation") shall hold the same as the non-party corporation.

(4) The U.S. District Court E-distribution case (hereinafter “instant distribution procedure”) in Ulsan District Court E-S., which took place on September 19, 2014, deposited KRW 28,587,314 to the Plaintiff and collected KRW 28,587,314,314, on the ground that the seizure is concurrent, and the said court deposited KRW 28,587,314 to the Plaintiff. The said court deposited KRW 2014,330,00 in Ulsan District Court E-S. (hereinafter “instant distribution procedure”). The Defendant B, on September 19, 2014, deposited KRW 2493,286, and KRW 9

arrow