The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is a confession and reflect on all of the crimes of this case; the defendant has no record of criminal punishment after entering Korea with ship; the defendant is waiting for marriage; the defendant's family and Matrimonial woman wanted to be married; each of the crimes of this case is not likely to have led to the purchase and medication of phiphones; however, the defendant's hair detection of phiphonephones from his mother's hair (from 10m to 11mm in the mother length; from 10 to 11m in the mother length); the rapid increase in the number and transactions of narcotics within the Republic of Korea is seriously threatened with the status as a clean nation for narcotics; considering that the defendant purchased and administered phiphones with his accomplices; the defendant is not likely to be guilty; the defendant's basic crime and concurrent crimes of this case; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor within the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court for each of the crimes of this case; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for two years (one year to three years; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for each of this case; the basic punishment range of imprisonment with prison labor for each of this case;

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.