1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B automobiles owned by A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to C automobiles (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. At around 10:30 on September 19, 2013, D driving the Defendant vehicle and proceeding along one lane of the two-lane road in front of the 304-Dong-dong Dong-dong, Daejeon, the two-lane road was changed to the two-lane, and the part of the left side of the Plaintiff vehicle, which changed the two-lane to the two-lane prior to the Defendant vehicle, proceeded into the front side of the Defendant vehicle.

The accident of this case(hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case").

Details of the specific accident are as shown in attached Form 2.

(C) On September 24, 2013, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 360,00 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (based on recognition). On September 24, 2013, the Plaintiff asserts that there is a conflict between the Plaintiff’s vehicle running on a two-lane one-lane and the Defendant’s vehicle changing the two-lanes from the first lane to the second lane, and the Defendant’s vehicle driving on a two-lanes, and that the accident of this case occurred in the instant vehicle, in light of the circumstances acknowledged by the witness’s testimony, the Plaintiff’s assertion that it is difficult to obtain the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane.