logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.15 2015가합11293
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The summary of the case is that the Defendant is liable to compensate the Defendant for the amount of KRW 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won from the loan, excluding the loan amount of KRW 12,000,000,000,000, and the loan amount of KRW 48,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, which was paid by the Plaintiff at the above KRW 600,00,00,00,00,00,00 for the performance of an exchange

Conclusion of Fact Exchange Contract on Condition

1. Place where the defendant's goods are located: The record of the items exchanged D: E-loan of five households (issuance of executory company);

2. The location of the plaintiff's goods: The Gyeonggi-do Yang-gun C, and fourteen parcels.

3. In concluding a water exchange contract of the above goods, the Defendant and the Plaintiff agreed to pay the water exchange difference to the Plaintiff under an agreement between them as follows.

Water exchange balance: 100,000,000 s n.e. 100,000 n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n.

The amount of the actual obligation of the plaintiff's real estate at the remainder of the special agreement shall be KRW 480,000,000,000,000.

b. The defendant and the plaintiff remaining at the remainder, the defendant's complete payment (issuance of executor), and the plaintiff exchange the registration documents in the presence of the broker.

As the Defendant and the Plaintiff concluded a contract by sufficiently examining the other party’s real estate, they do not raise any civil or criminal objection.

On April 25, 2005, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an exchange contract with respect to the following terms as to the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, and 14 parcels owned by the Plaintiff, as well as D E-Ba ( Apartment) No. 102, 102, and 4 households, which the Defendant had sold in lots:

On January 4, 2006, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on the sales contract on September 8, 2005 in the Defendant’s future on January 4, 2006, and the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership with the exception of 102 Dong 102 and 201 among E-Ba five households.

arrow