1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The plaintiff asserts that, since the plaintiff entered into a building lease brokerage contract with the defendant and arranged a building lease contract between the defendant and C, the defendant is obligated to pay 14.10 million won and the delay compensation to the plaintiff as an intermediary under the above brokerage contract.

If the Plaintiff and the Defendant seem to have complied with the formation of the mediation contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, the entry of No. 6-1 (Witness 6) in the above written statement is an employee of the Plaintiff’s brokerage office, and it appears that the Plaintiff is interested by participating in the conclusion of the lease contract between the Defendant and C. If the Defendant requests the Plaintiff who is a licensed real estate agent, it would not be necessary to place an advertisement on the daily information. According to the respective descriptions of No. 1-1 and No. 2, it is difficult to believe in light of the fact that the Defendant posted an advertisement to lease a commercial building to E, a living information place.

Each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 is insufficient to recognize the fact that the plaintiff's assertion was entered into a brokerage contract, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Ultimately, the plaintiff's assertion based on the premise that the mediation contract was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition.