A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:10 on September 23, 2020, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the police officer once again, on his hand, on September 23, 2020, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Defendant, who was called up after having received a 112 report that the Defendant was drunk, and sent to the police officer, and (c) obstructed the Defendant, and (d) took a restaurant, etc., by the police officer E of the police box belonging to the Kimbu Police Station: (a) took a bath to the said police officer; and (b) continuously took a look at the chest part of the police officer’s chest part; (b) took the Defendant’s desire to attract and threaten the surrounding persons; and (c) assaulted the above police officer once again with his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each investigation report law to E in the police statement protocol;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The fact that a defendant has a criminal record of having been sentenced to a fine of one million won due to the crime of destroying or damaging special objects; the crime of obstructing performance of official duties is a crime causing harm to police officers who act to protect the lives and bodies of citizens, and there is a need for strict punishment to the extent that it causes harm to the public security power and disturbs the safety of citizen life.

1. Reasons for sentencing favorable: The defendant has taken the attitude that his mistake is divided in depth and reflects his mistake.

In this regard, there is no criminal power for the obstruction of performance of official duties.

The sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.