The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The defendant in the factory office is a person who is engaged in the operation of the Doning Motor Vehicle.

On May 23, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of 92.9km per hour according to the two-lanes of speed from the shooting distance of the Jinwon middle school in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city

At the time, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the speed limit and accurately manipulating the steering and operating the steering system, since it is a road with a speed of 70km a speed of 70km a speed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the limitation speed exceeding 22.9 km at a speed, and proceeded with the driving distance prior to the Southernnam Middle School from the southwon Middle School to the parking area of a tent in the vicinity of the city. The Defendant’s right side part of the F bargaining Motor Vehicle E (the age of 29) driving was shocked into the front part of the Defendant’s driving motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, 3/4 times in need of approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, such as the escape of the prosecution.

The defendant's side asserts that at the time of the accident of this case, the vehicle was operated at a speed of 80 km per hour, and that the vehicle was not operated at a speed of 92.9 km per hour as stated in the facts charged.

As evidence supporting that the speed of the defendant vehicle is 92.9 km per hour, the comprehensive analysis of traffic accidents and G's prosecutor's office and this court statements are prepared.

However, the comprehensive analysis of traffic accidents is based on the accident point, vehicle movement distance after the accident, and track trace, etc. based on the premise that the defendant's vehicle and the victim's vehicle used a straight-line movement, which is presumed to be "presumed" at the time of the accident, and this is based on an ideal situation.