A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million on June 5, 2008 to a fine of KRW 1.5 million on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), and a fine of KRW 1.5 million on November 26, 2015 to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court's Tongwon District Court's Tongwon District Court's branch branch office on November 26, 201.

[Criminal facts]

1. On May 12, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (divatedless Driving) (divated Driving) driving a B straw car under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.064% in the section of approximately 300 meters from the front of the pharmacy to the front of the East-gu apartment in the city of Gyeongnam-do at the Gyeongnam-do, at around 20:45 on May 12, 2017, without a driver’s license.

2. On May 12, 2017, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around 20:45, the Defendant placed the Defendant’s type E resident registration number (F) on the front of the apartment building in front of the Dong-dong, the Dong-gu Police Station’s expense, and the Defendant’s type E resident registration number (F) of the Defendant, who was in the middle of his/her reputation, and was subject to the Defendant’s request for confirmation of his/her personal information, as he/she was his/her resident registration number.

In this respect, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2, prepared a statement report on the situation of the driver at the State, and continuously demanded the signature and seal of the Defendant, stated the “E” on the driver’s sexual name column of the driver’s circumstantial statement report on the State-owned driver’s circumstantial statement with the color tag to be used for the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s signature and seal. The Defendant forged the statement report on the driver’s circumstantial statement in the name of E, which is a private document on proof of fact by arbitrarily signing on the back and sealing his/her own seal, and exercised the false private document to the above D as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on driving under drinking;