logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.11.08 2013고정1063
석유및석유대체연료사업법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 8,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants were punished by fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In order to operate a general retail shop among Defendant A petroleum retail business, a report shall be filed with the competent authority, and a petroleum retailer, etc. shall not sell light oil as fuel for a vehicle for light oil;

Nevertheless, at around 18:30 on March 11, 2013, Defendant A received 140,000 won from E factory sites located in Daegu-gun (Seoul-gun) to move-sale vehicles using F home-type transportation vehicles owned by (ju) Dong-type, and received 140,000 won, such as G dump trucks trucks, and sold them to many and unspecified persons, including the market price, from around the Seocheon-gu, Daegu-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2013 to 16:30 on June 25, 2013, Defendant A: (a) conducted H on the street in front of the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-si, 200 to 190,645 won, using the I home-type transportation vehicle moving-saleed to an end of 140,645 won; (b) from around 10, 2000 to May 25, 2012.

As a result, Defendant A did not report to the competent authorities, operated a general retail shop among petroleum retail business, and sold a light oil as fuel for a vehicle for transit.

2. Defendant B is a person who runs a petroleum sales business with the trade name “L” in Seogugu K in Daegu-gu.

No petroleum retailer shall supply petroleum products or alternative fuels to any person other than a legitimate petroleum retailer or actual consumer, in violation of the scope of each petroleum retail business or the business methods.

Nevertheless, from October 2012 to March 11, 2013, Defendant B sold approximately 150,000 liters, including the sum of market prices of KRW 204,000,000, to the above A who is not a legitimate petroleum retailer or actual consumer in the above L.

As a result, Defendant B supplied a person who is not a real consumer in violation of the scope of each petroleum retail business or business methods, which is detrimental to the sound distribution order.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow