1.(a)

피고 AR, AS는 연대하여 원고들에게 별지 4 청구금액 및 인용금액 표 ㈏ 인용금액 중 합계...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) Defendant R’s status as the party to the instant park cemetery is collectively referred to as “AX” or “AY” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant park cemetery, irrespective of the aforementioned trade names, in the case of Macheon-si AW forest.

Defendant AS is a person operating the instant park cemetery as the wife of Defendant AR, and Defendant AS is a person registered as the representative of the instant park cemetery. Defendant AT, AU, and AV are children of Defendant AR and AS. 2) The Plaintiffs are people who live in a grave in the instant park cemetery.

B. Pocheon Viewers filed a charge of violating the Funeral Services, etc. Act against the charge of illegally installing the instant park cemetery. Since Pocheon Viewing out standing timber without permission from the Minister of the Korea Forest Service, AR was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Mountainous Districts Management Act (Seoul Central District Court 201No354) and the Funeral Services Act (hereinafter “Mountainous Districts Management Act”) on the ground that it was found that the instant park cemetery was installed on the site and buried the body of a dead body, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the said Act. Accordingly, Defendant AR appealed appealed appealed on the Seoul High Court 201No1783, but did not dismiss the appeal on October 21, 2011, and thereafter, it became final and conclusive on December 14, 2011 with respect to the said grave installed on the same site. The judgment of the said appellate court became final and conclusive on the ground that it was a relative of the Plaintiff’s grave, which was installed on March 23, 2012.