1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the land research division in which the Japanese colonial rule was prepared, it is written that the I, who resides in H on January 23, 1916, entered the 745 square meters all G in Gangwon-do Y-gun G, Gangwon-do into the land research division.

B. The above land was divided into Gangnam-si J, F, and K land, and the registration of ownership transfer in Defendant C’s name (hereinafter “instant registration of ownership transfer”) was completed as of February 24, 1995 by the court receipt of the above court on June 30, 1965 as the receipt No. 17199 on June 30, 1965 for the F 457.

C. On February 18, 1965, NN residing in M was written as the owner on the old land cadastre of this case, and on February 18, 1965, the ownership preservation registration of this case was completed pursuant to Article 1657 of the aforementioned Act on June 30, 1965.

On June 23, 2005, the sum totaling 457 square meters (151 square meters) was divided into the sum totaling 850 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and the sum totaling 661 square meters prior to theO.

E. I died on April 30, 1946. On July 28, 1937, 1937, the Plaintiff, a senior grandchild, succeeded to I’s property as the family heir.

L died on January 22, 2008, and Defendant B, D, and E jointly inherited their property.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap's 1 to 4, Eul's 1 to 3, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the land of this case was owned by the plaintiff's father I, and was owned by the above I because the plaintiff's father I was under the influence of Japanese occupation, and he forged L documents and completed the registration of ownership preservation in the future. The registration of ownership preservation in this case is null and void, and the defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer in this case because it was based on the registration of ownership preservation in this case null and void from