logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2017.12.19 2017나30900
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with A and B (hereinafter "Plaintiff vehicle"), and the defendant is not more than C vehicle.

A mutual aid operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement in relation thereto.

B. Around 06:50 on September 26, 2016, the Defendant’s driver driven the Defendant’s vehicle and proceeded along one lane on the front road of Gangseo-si, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle followed the Defendant’s vehicle.

C. The Defendant’s vehicle continuously changed the vehicle to a two-lane in order to turn to the opposite one-lane in order to turn to the opposite one-lane in the direction of the Gangseo Cultural Center at the port center, and the speed is reduced. The Defendant’s vehicle changed from the two-lane to the one-lane, and changed to the opposite one-lane. In the process, the Defendant’s vehicle followed the Defendant’s vehicle, as seen above, and received the right part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which just moved to the opposite one-lane, as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle

hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case"

(D) The place where the instant accident occurred is a road in which U.S. is not permitted. The Defendant vehicle driver changed the vehicle line into the two-lane as above and did not turn on any direction direction, etc. until the vehicle driver attempted to turn on the opposite lane. E. On October 31, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,327,000 as insurance money to the Plaintiff’s driver for the instant accident. The Plaintiff paid KRW 2,327,00 as insurance money to the Plaintiff’s driver. The Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the grounds for recognition. 【The entry in the evidence Nos. 3 and 4, the video of the evidence No. 1

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. 1) The plaintiff asserts that the accident in this case occurred due to the total negligence of the defendant's vehicle, and the plaintiff paid KRW 2,327,00 as the repair cost of the plaintiff's vehicle according to the accident in this case. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the above KRW 2,327,00 with the amount of indemnity and the delay damages therefor. 2) The defendant asserts that the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the above KRW 2,3

arrow