All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The favorable circumstance is that the judgment defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected.

On the other hand, the Defendant committed the instant crime without having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment twice for the same crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime without having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for one year in the support of the Daejeon District Court on November 17, 2016, which became final and conclusive on November 25, 2016 and became final and conclusive on November 25, 2016, and that the number and quantity of the Defendant purchased and administered phiphones are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

In addition to these circumstances, there is no special change in circumstances that may vary from the court below to the trial of the party, and in full view of all the factors of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too heavy or it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too heavy.

Therefore, each of the defendant and the prosecutor's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.