Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000 (three million).

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny in the Seoul Southern District Court on June 30, 201, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 4 times as a result of larceny, and around November 23, 2012, the Defendant was requested to the Seoul Central District Court for summary order by larceny.

On December 4, 2012, around 12:50 on December 12:12, 2012, the Defendant used a cresh in the Damart operated by the victim C, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which caused a lot of goods worth KRW 4,980,00 in total, 2 soldiers and 1 strings.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

On June 30, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for special larceny by the Seoul Southern District Court on June 30, 2009, and was sentenced to four times for larceny. On January 7, 2013, the Defendant was indicted to the Seoul Central District Court on the charge of larceny, and is currently tried by the third Germany of the above court.

1. At around 16:00 on December 22, 2012, the Defendant cited one mobile phone leather case equivalent to 18,000 won at the market price displayed in the “G mobile phone store” operated by the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and stolen it.

2. At around 16:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by putting 18,000 won at the market price displayed in the “J” store located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul at around 16:10 on the same day.

3. At around 16:15 on the same day, the Defendant, in front of the above “L” store run by K, cited the total amount of KRW 40,000,000, which is the 20,000 market value of female-use ground, exhibited at that place.

Summary of Evidence

"2013 Highest 42"

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Evidential photographs "2013, 42";

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each statement of F, I, and K;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts;