logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.15 2014고단4874
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B and Defendant C conspired to operate a sexual traffic business establishment in a non-permanent place located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 2013, 2013, around H (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) and the date of the lower order.

Accordingly, H proposed the conduct of officetels sexual traffic to Defendant A, who was aware of around that time, notified the Defendants of the method of operation of the commercial sex acts establishments, and Defendant B provided funds for opening the commercial sex acts establishments, and Defendant C and Defendant A decided to operate the actual business establishment.

Defendants and H leased Seocho-gu Seoul International Officetel 1202, and operated the business of the trade name “J”, thereby employing K as female employees.

From October 2013 to October 22, 2013, the Defendants conspired with H to engage in commercial sex acts, such as arranging sexual traffic, in collusion with H, by providing the above 1,50,000 won from the non-name customers and providing the above 1,202 guidance, and allowing K employees of women to provide sexual intercourse with their customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the defendant A and B

1. The legal statements of a witness A and B among the four-time public trial records;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to K;

1. Application of a copy of passbook and financial transaction details statutes;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendants)

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of each Criminal Code (the Defendants) of the community service order (the scope of recommendations / [the scope of punishment / brokerage] of sexual traffic crimes subject to age 19 or older, and the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic (the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic by business and payment, etc.) in the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing)] (the decision of sentence] Defendant B and C are the business owners, and Defendant A committed the crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case as an employee.

The act of arranging sexual traffic in this case was relatively short, and the profits therefrom would be much high.

arrow