beta
Text
1. Defendant D’s KRW 62,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from April 15, 2016 to July 19, 2017, and the following:
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On April 15, 2016, the Plaintiff remitted 3,00,000,5,000,000,5,000,1000,10,0000,10,0000, 10,0000,000, 10,0000,000,000, 20,0000,000,000,000, 20,000,20,000,200,000, 20,000,000,30,000,000,000,37,000,000,000,0000, 37,000,000,000,000,0000,000.
B. After the above transfer, the Plaintiff applied for the suspension of payment to the Nonghyup Bank.
C. Since then, the Plaintiff received a telephone from a person who was not the party’s name, and the person who was named was asked to cancel the application for the suspension of payment of KRW 15,00,000 to send the above account, and the remaining amount would also be immediately sent when the decision for suspension of payment is revoked. On April 25, 2016, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 15,000,000 in the name of the Defendant Company.
Since the opening of the account at the end of March 2016, various amounts of money was deposited from several persons at several times each day, and the said money was deposited, and the money was immediately transferred to the master of the limited company.
E. The said money deposited by the Plaintiff was immediately deposited into a master for a limited liability company, and only KRW 9,300,90 after April 15, 2016 remains.
F. On May 10, 2016, the Plaintiff reported damage to the police with the following content.
On April 15, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff were operating a game site in a foreign country among the conversations with the Plaintiff on the Internet Messenger on 15, 2016, and the Plaintiff proposed to lend interest of 10% after 15,000 won to the head of the Tong in the name of the Defendant Company, which was known by the winners of the name in response thereto, and transferred to a close range of 100 million won. However, if the number of the winners of the name was more than 70,000 won, the amount of the profit would be 20%, and the amount of 67,000,000 won would be transferred again.
However, in the Messenger's name rejection request for the suspension of payment to the above account on the ground of the spirit of the Gap-ssenger's self-ssenger, and the defendant C.