1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against P who is represented by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are as follows: the descendants of "E" and the descendants of "F" are not sufficient to recognize that they are members of the same clan as the members of the same clan as the evidence additionally submitted by the court of first instance; and the entries of Gap Nos. 51, 52, 54, and 60 (including the number of branch numbers) shall be rejected; except for the determination of the new argument made by the plaintiff at the court of first instance in paragraph (2), the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. 1) With respect to the assertion of the F's title of the family property, the current status of the clan property among the Class B, which was decided from 1991 by the Plaintiff, is indicated in the Rules of the clan Association, and the "Z" recorded as the joint owners of the Young-gu X and Y land is the descendants of F. F. As alleged by the Defendant, if the clan B consists of only the descendants of F.E, the clan property was not registered in the name of F.F. 25 years old, the members of the clan B included the follow-up descendants of F. 25 years old. 2) No. 53, No. 61, and No. 1 and No. 62, No. 1 and No. 2, and No. 1 and No. 92, and the title of the clan C. 23 years old, and the title of the clan C. 9 years old and No. 23 years old, the title of the clan was changed to the ownership of the 25 years old, and it was established in the 2000.