The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

When the parents of the defendant living in a poor economic difficulty while living in the world, the circumstances of family environment are recognized, such as the parents of the defendant's young children, and the parents of the defendant's young children are raising.

However, even though the defendant was a 20th majority youth, he was living as a means of larceny rather than trying to support his family by doing normal occupational activities. The defendant used all money that he disposed of stolen goods as a means of living, such as PC and soup fee, food value, travel expenses with female-friendly women, etc., the defendant was first guilty, but he was carrying 24 times during the 2-month period, while carrying with him a room, such as knife, knife, knife, guard, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc., and committed the crime. In particular, the defendant committed the crime in confrontation with the victims. Considering the place of the crime, method of the crime, goods possessed by the defendant at ordinary times, etc., it is very dangerous act that may lead to robbery depending on the circumstances, the reason why the defendant did not pay damages to the defendant, etc., and the reason behind the crime of this case's argument is unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.