logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.09.24 2019가단10012
용역비
Text

All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Around July 4, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with Defendant B and the Plaintiff’s purchase and sale contract with the Defendants by acquiring the land owners, including Defendant B and the Plaintiff, Seopopo City D, and six parcels of land. This is separate from the service contract with the Defendants on July 4, 2018.

In around 2018, the Plaintiff completed the provision of services, and Defendant C agreed to jointly and severally assume all the obligations of Defendant B.

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the service cost of KRW 70 million and the damages for delay.

2. In full view of the purport of the entries and the entire arguments by the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the plaintiff Gap (including the provisional number), the fact that the sales contract was concluded with the legal person to be incorporated by the defendant Eul and the defendant Eul as the purchaser around June 8, 2018 with respect to the parcels of non-

However, if Defendant C and E Co., Ltd. (Representative Plaintiff) concluded a separate service contract between the Plaintiff and Defendant B on July 4, 2018, not only the service contract concluded on July 4, 2018 (A) but also the separate service contract concluded on the conclusion of the above service contract, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and the witness F’s testimony alone are insufficient to recognize this. There

The plaintiff's claim is without merit without further review.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.

arrow