logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.07 2015고단7410
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are temporary workers on construction sites, and victims E (56) are the heads of the teams at construction sites.

1. On July 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault by Defendant C, while talking about “G” at the entrance of the Busan Geum-gu market on July 31, 2015, at the frequency of “G”; (b) the victim did not pay wages in May 2015; and (c) assaulted the victim’s erobbage.

2. On July 31, 2015, Defendant B assaulted the victim’s knife at a “G” parking lot located at the entrance of the F market in the Geum-gu, Busan on July 31, 2015, while talking about the victim’s failure to pay wages in May 2015.

3. The Defendant, as described in paragraph (2) at the time, at the place, and as described in paragraph (2), committed an assault against the victim who was assaulted from the above B, while speaking for the assaulting of the said B, he saw the victim’s bomb.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (record a statement by shot H telephone);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime (elective of a punishment);

1. Parts of the crimes under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are not committed in the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendants are the daily workers on the construction site, and the victims E (56) is the head of the construction site team.

On July 31, 2015, around 22:05, at the frequency of “G” located at the entrance of the Busan Geum-gu F market, the Defendants: (a) talked about the victim’s failure to pay the amount of wages in May 2015; (b) Defendant C, when coming from the frequency of the above frequency, her face was frighted by drinking the victim’s face; and (c) Defendant A was salpted by salpting the victim’s breath; (d) Defendant A was salpted by salpting the victim’s breath; and Defendant B was salpted by the victim.

As a result, the Defendants jointly do so to the victim for about four weeks of treatment, such as the closure of the pipe flag, etc. (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

arrow