logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.08.31 2018구합20865
구룡포일반산업단지사업시행자지정및실시계획승인취소처분무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Defendant’s A general industrial complex planning approval and notification 1) On September 21, 2010, the Defendant is entitled to the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Simplification of Authorization and Permission Procedures for Industrial Complexes (hereinafter “Industrial Complex Fire-Fighting Act”).

Article 15 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act (hereinafter “Industrial Sites Act”)

A) Pursuant to Articles 7-4 and 19-2, the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City and D Ilwon 94,655 square meters shall be designated as a A general industrial complex pursuant to Article 7-4 and the project operator shall be designated as the Plaintiff, and the A general industrial complex project operator shall be designated as the Plaintiff, and the A general industrial complex project operator shall be designated and the implementation plan shall be approved and announced (the name, location, and name of the industrial complex E. 1. at port: The name, location, and area of the A general industrial complex: the location of the A general industrial complex: South-gu, Gyeongbuk-do

2. The purpose is to establish the industrial infrastructure in south-si areas in connection with the F complex and national industrial complex, and to build the industrial complex capable of strengthening the foundation for self-reliance in the regional economy, through the planned supply of industrial locations;

3. Project operator Plaintiff

4. Period of development of an industrial complex: The period of project from 2010 to 2013) the Defendant approved a A general industrial complex plan (revision) on December 31, 2013 by extending the expiration date of the period of project of an industrial complex from 2013 to 30 June 31, 2016, and publicly notified the designation of a project implementer for A general industrial complex and revocation of approval of an implementation plan. (b) The Defendant failed to implement an A general industrial complex development project according to the development plan on September 19, 2016, and failed to secure 50/100 of the ownership of the land within five years after the approval of the project, on the ground that the Defendant failed to secure 50/100 of the ownership of the land within five years after the designation and approval of the industrial complex. The designation and implementation plan was revoked and publicly notified pursuant to Article 48 of the Industrial Sites Act.

(P) On September 23, 2016, the Plaintiff revoked the initial disposition in the Daegu District Court (2016Guhap22164).

arrow