logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.11.28 2018고단4437
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in breach of trust tried to pay KRW 1,200,000 per month to the victim C at his/her own residence in Dongbcheon-si, B, 2012, with the interest of KRW 20,000,000 per month except for the first month after receiving the 200,000,000,000 from the first month for the month when he/she received the 1,000,000 won from the month following the month when he/she received the 200,000,000 won from the month when he/she received the 200,000 won of the 21,000,000 won of the 21,000 won of the 20,000 won of the 20,000,000 won of the 20,000 won

In the end, the victim joined the above number system at 19, 20, and 21.

From around that time to April 20, 2014, the Defendant continued to receive KRW 60 million in total from the damaged party, from the damaged party, to the day on which April 20, 2014.

Since the Defendant received a fraternity payment from the members, including the victim, the Defendant was obligated to pay KRW 23.4 million, respectively, around February 20, 2014, which was the date of payment of the fraternity payment No. 19, which was around February 20, 2014 and around March 20, 2014, which was the date of payment of the fraternity No. 20,000,000 won, around April 20, 2014.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in violation of his duties, did not pay the remainder of the total amount of KRW 10 million, among the total amount of KRW 70,200,000,000,000 to be paid to the victim, other than that of the around June 25, 2014 and July 7, 2014 of the same year.

As a result, the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 50,200,000,000, and suffered property damages equivalent to the same amount to the victim.

2. The Defendant was unable to pay a timely guidance to the members of the fraternity who had organized and operated the number system from the mid-2012 Police Officers as described in the above paragraph 1, and the system of the fraternity was collapsed, and even if the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to operate the fraternity, it would be deemed that he newly organized and operated the normal system.

arrow