Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was dismissed while working in D, which is a child protection facility operated by the victim C, in order to publish a letter that slanders the above facility.

At around 01:38 on September 4, 2014, the Defendant, as the title “E”, written and posted a false statement stating that “(not omitted) a child with a intellectual disability is treated as a mentally ill person, and is unable to manage it in a living facility,” and on the grounds that he/she is annoyingly and unfortunateed, he/she is detained in a mental hospital without his/her parents’ consent.”

However, in fact, there was no abuse of a child who has a intellectual disability in the above facility, by placing him/her in a mental hospital without the consent of his/her parents.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Entry of the defendant's partial statement in the suspect examination protocol against the defendant and H's statement;

1. The description of the defendant's partial statement and I's statement in each police interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Each police statement to I, J, and K;

1. The Defendant asserts that there was no false perception and purpose of slandering the content of the Kakakao Stockholm dialogue, child welfare facility report certificate, notices printed out, family relation certificate, family minutes, and investigation report (L mother’s telephone conversations, etc.) posted on the victim’s complaint book, Kakao Kakao Scaro, which the suspect dialogues with K. However, ① from August 18, 2014 to September 2, 2014, the Defendant worked as a facility at the group home in the victim’s management unit and was dismissed on September 2, 2014, published the same writing as indicated in the facts charged, ② all of them posted the Defendant’s writing composed of ten shorts.