Text
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 355,262,875 as well as KRW 350,00,000 from April 10, 2014 to March 30, 2016.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
On June 3, 2004, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff a promissory note with a face value of KRW 100,000,000 at each of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City at the place of payment at the place of issue payment. If the payment of the above promissory note is delayed, a notary public, stating that there is no objection even if compulsory execution is conducted immediately, has drawn up a notarized promissory note No. 627 of the 2004 Office.
On September 22, 2004, the Plaintiff lent KRW 100,000,00 to the Defendant as security, Co., Ltd. KRW 10,000,000.
On November 23, 2004, the Plaintiff set the maturity of KRW 150,000,000 to the Defendant as security and lent the amount of KRW 150,000 to the Defendant on December 20, 204.
On December 26, 2012, the Defendant promised to repay the amount of KRW 350,000,000,000 to the Plaintiff on June 3, 2004, KRW 100,000,00,000 borrowed from the Plaintiff on September 22, 2004, and KRW 100,000,000, which was borrowed from the purchase and sale of shares on September 22, 2004, and KRW 350,000,000, which was acquired by deceit as security, as well as the amount of KRW 150,000,00,00, which was borrowed from the Plaintiff on November 23, 2004. The Defendant is obliged to pay the principal and interest to the Plaintiff from December 23, 2013, and is liable for all civil criminal liability if it is impossible to perform.
A) The document was prepared and delivered. [Grounds for Recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence No. 1 (the defendant stated only the resident registration number and telephone number in the payment note, and did not write his signature and seal, but according to the witness E’s testimony, since the fact that the defendant directly signed and sealed on the payment note is recognized, the entire document’s authenticity is presumed to have been established), Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 5 (including the number with each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).
According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the Defendant agreed to pay 350,000,000 won, which is the sum of the previous principal of the obligation, in lieu of the rights and obligations prior to the preparation of the instant statement of payment, to the Plaintiff, with the interest on December 1, 2013.