logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.08.14 2014고정1071
하천법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Any person who intends to occupy and use land in a river area shall obtain permission from the competent river management agency.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent river management agency from around 1990 to March 2014, occupied and used a river site by constructing an illegal building consisting of a room, a room, and a warehouse in Gwangju City, which is a river site, from around 1990 to March 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 95 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and subparagraph 5 of Article 95 of the River Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the fact that the defendant is aged, the fact that there is no record of punishment other than the minor fine, the fact that there is no record of punishment other than the one time minor fine, and the neighboring residents want to dismiss the defendant's wife against the defendant, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing such as the defendant's character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered by the summary order shall be partially reduced and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.

arrow