(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.07.22 2019나22806

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.07.22 2019나22806

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant for damages arising from a tort in the first instance trial against the defendant in the proceedings of this case and the scope and order of judgment of this court.

The Defendant served as the head of the Plaintiff’s director administration office from June 22, 2006, and took charge of the Plaintiff’s accounting accounting affairs. It is the summary of its assertion that the Defendant embezzled the Plaintiff’s total amount of KRW 734,934,578 from August 1, 2006 to December 10, 2014.

The Plaintiff claimed 655,618,549 won and damages for delay in the amount of embezzlement.

The first instance court rendered a judgment against the plaintiff who rejected the plaintiff's claim.

The plaintiff appealed against this.

The plaintiff reduced the principal stated in the purport of the claim to KRW 484,528,011 through the submission of the request and the statement of the request for change on December 16, 2019 in this court.

In other words, the Plaintiff reduced the principal stated in the purport of the claim by 381,752,463 won, the scope of delay damages to 5% per annum from the day following the delivery of the complaint of this case to the adjudication day of complete payment, and 12% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment.

In reducing the purport of the claim as above, the Plaintiff asserted to the effect that the Defendant’s act as stated in Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 20 of the attached Table Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 10, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance (the same as the attached Table of this judgment)

In full view of this, the scope of the judgment of this court shall be limited to the part as stated in the No. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 20 of the attached Table No. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 10, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 20 of the judgment of the court (

유사 판례

-부산고등법원 2018.08.24 2018누21309

-서울고등법원 2017.06.09 2016나2052584

-서울고등법원 2017.02.09 2016나2051208

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.18 2016가단5285983

-광주지방법원 2015.05.21 2013구합1430