The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable. The punishment (4 million won) imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has a favorable condition to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the defendant's mistake and reflects the fact that the damaged goods of the crime of acquiring stolen goods have been returned to the victim, but each of the crimes of this case is sold a motor vehicle without the transfer registration of the motor vehicle acquired by the defendant. The crime of this case not only makes it difficult for the defendant to recover damage and promote the crime of this case, but also harms the order of the motor vehicle distribution, harms the order of the motor vehicle distribution, but also causes the "large-scale vehicle" to be added to the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, motive, process, method, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment of the court below is too unfair since all of the sentencing factors of this case as shown in the argument of this case are too excessive.

3. According to the conclusion, Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act: Provided, That in the judgment below, it is obvious that “benz vehicle equivalent to KRW 90 million” in the 2nd 8 and 9nd 2nd 80,000 is a clerical error in “A6 vehicle of KRW 621 million”, and thus, it is corrected to “62,100,000 A6 vehicle of KRW 60,000.”