(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.14 2014나104245

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.14 2014나104245

약정금

Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant’s KRW 58,894,765 for the Plaintiff and its related expenses from May 1, 2012 to July 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts are corporations established for the purpose of the manufacture and practical processing business of tobacco, civil engineering fiber manufacturing business, etc.

On February 1, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an agency contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant agency contract”) with the following terms and conditions.

The defendant of the agency contract (hereinafter referred to as "A"), the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "B"), and the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff) are aware that trade between them is based on mutual trust in relation to this contract, and the purpose of this contract is to maintain a fair trade relationship by faithfully performing each provision stipulated in this contract with good faith.

Article 2 (General Rights and Obligations)

1.A shall be responsible for and continuously improving the quality of products and assist B in its business activities, and B shall promptly provide A with the business status and information that A requests.

2.B shall manage the overall performance of business and contract management activities, and Party A shall be liable for the supply and quality deposit.

Article 3 (Scope of Business - Scope of Recognition of Procurement Business Results)

1. B shall submit a report on business activities to A before the contract for procurement after designing and reflecting the e-mail, and shall be based on the report on business activities;

Where a business overlaps with another agency, the A's operation rate shall apply after mutual agreement.

2. The term “design reflection” shall be regarded as the top priority to a design request to the head office, and the design drawings and specifications and specifications of design shall be recognized to be submitted to A in case of a case designed at the other company;

3. At least 100,000 won of the cases reflected in the design in E-Sagrid, Eul must do its best to enable us to award a successful tender, and even if the design reflection was known, it is recognized as the business of E-S by its effort.

Article 2 (Unit Price for Government-Rates and Private-Level Units)

1. Egnets - The Government Procurement Service (Government Grade).

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2014.07.17 2013가단28985

-창원지방법원 2019.10.18 2019나122

-서울남부지방법원 2021.02.03 2020가단253359

-부산지방법원 2015.05.21 2013가합10522

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.04 2013가합79639