1. As to KRW 155,886,00 among the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant and KRW 81,835,000 among the said money, the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall have the effect on May 2, 2017.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The status A of a stock company A (hereinafter “A”) is a company that aims at lighting manufacturing business, real estate leasing business, etc.

B. In accordance with Article 9-2 of the former Procurement Act (amended by Act No. 13817, Jan. 27, 2016) and Article 18 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Procurement Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25680, Nov. 4, 2014), the Defendant designated the purchase type and fixed indoor lighting, etc. produced by A as an excellent technical product.

C. On May 4, 2016, A and the Defendant entered into a commodity supply contract between A and the Defendant to supply indoor lighting, etc. to a procuring entity (hereinafter “instant commodity supply contract”).

2) Of the main contents of the instant product supply contract and the specifications of the C indoor lighting that A must deliver, the parts related to the instant case are as follows: The number of indoor lighting lighting: 23,600 won contract amount: 2,735,300 won: the delivery condition: the delivery place n.e., product structure as stipulated in the n.b. specification; 4.2.1.2.2.2.4.2.2.2.2.2. the number of indoor lighting lights, etc. controlled by the electric source location, which are physically independent strings for the indoor lighting, etc.; and the Defendant’s comprehensive provision of the goods should be registered and arranged through the National Electronic Procurement System (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Electronic Procurement System”).