logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.11.12 2020고단2694
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 18, 2010, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by driving a motor vehicle with a strong alcohol concentration of about 0.090% from the 1km section to the roads in front of the Egas filling station in Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Seoul, around 08:20 on July 30, 202, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by driving a motor vehicle with a strong alcohol concentration of about 0.090% under the influence of alcohol from the 1km section to the roads in front of the Egas filling station in the same Gu.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle with a low bid as stated in paragraph (1).

The defendant, as stated in paragraph (1), driven the above-mentioned vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as stated in paragraph (1), led to the two-lane road in front of the gas filling station as described in paragraph (1) along the sub-clori-distance from the sub-cloriline to the salt farm distance.

At the time, the Defendant’s vehicle front side was driven by the Victim G (50 years old) and the HCoC car was stopped in the signal atmosphere, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to prevent the accident by driving the vehicle while keeping the vehicle front well.

The defendant received the rear part of the above C-A-car as the front part of the vehicle of the defendant's vehicle in front of the above C-A-car without examining the front section, and due to the shock, the victim I (the age of 65) who was driving on the front section of the C-A-car, was driving by the victim I (the age of 65).

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim G, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim G, and inflicted injury on the victim I, such as sugars, which had no room for two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim I, and around four weeks of medical treatment on the victim K (V, 61 years of age) who was on board the franchising car.

arrow