logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.20 2014가합53047
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 330,853,668 to Plaintiff A; KRW 6,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 3,00,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A is the Central University Hospital located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 221-4 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The Defendant is the employer of the medical staff of the Defendant hospital, who is a juristic person operating the Defendant hospital. The Defendant is the husband of the Plaintiff A, the Plaintiff C, and the Plaintiff D.

B. On June 26, 2011, Plaintiff A was hospitalized in the Defendant hospital and discharged on August 5, 2011 due to sub-defluorial brain fluorial brain fluorial brain fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor.

However, there was no discovery of special symptoms related to symptoms, and the plaintiff A was continuously treated with pharmacologic and preserved rehabilitation treatment, but discharged on October 5, 201 without showing symptoms.

3) On February 23, 2012, Plaintiff A regularly visited Defendant Hospital to the outside on a regular basis after the discharge, was subject to pharmacologic treatment. On the part of Defendant Hospital, Plaintiff A hospitalized in the department of the fire extinguisher at the Defendant Hospital due to fire extinguishing, scarcity, oral soil, and physical decrease, etc., and did not find any special scarcity other than scarcity infection. 4) On April 27, 2012, Plaintiff A complained that Plaintiff A had no hurrious, explic, explic, fluoric, fire extinguishing, scarcity, stomat, and stove, and that the body was reduced from 53 km to 35 km for a year, and that there was no help in the existing treatment.

Accordingly, the rehabilitation medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, on the same day, allows the Plaintiff A to suspend the use of crypists, such as Ethrhum, Ullass, Arobes, etc., for which the Plaintiff had already been used as such, and the pharmaceutical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, who is a narcotics-related control, is over 50 cmg/h (hereinafter referred to as the “penta-dopary”).

arrow