Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is more than four times the criminal records of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office on March 25, 2013, in addition to those subject to juvenile protection disposition by special larceny at the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office, and on July 12, 2013, Defendant B was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Daejeon District Court on July 12, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 20, 2013, and has the same criminal records more than five times during the grace period.
On October 2013, at around 12:00, the Defendants confirmed that the first race was cut off at the Victim E’s house located in Sejong Type D, and that there was no way to divide the first race into the house, and Defendant B opened the gate, Defendant A opened the gate with the gate opened by Defendant B, and opened the gate outside the gate, and opened the gate outside the gate that was not locked, and Defendant B entered the house through the gate opened by the Defendant A, and Defendant B entered the house through the gate, and then the Defendants habitually stolen 120,000 won in cash from the victim’s wall located in the inside, as well as habitually, from that time until February 27, 2014 to February 11:00, 2014.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants
1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;
1. Each statement of E, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z and AA;
1. AB's report on damage;
1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. Photographs of the place of crime, photograph of the damaged scene, on-site photograph, and photograph of the scene of crime;
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, references to criminal records, references to criminal records, etc., and investigation reports;
1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned manner;
1. Each of the relevant Articles of law concerning the facts constituting an offense;