1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the following amount.

1. On June 20, 2018, at the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the collision with the Defendant’s vehicle, which was changing the lane from the first lane to the second lane while the vehicle stopped on the third lane of the instant road, which is a four-lane, at the location of Goyang-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong (hereinafter “instant road”) around June 20, 2018 at the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, conflicts with the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of changing the lane from the first lane to the second lane, and due to the shock, the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the location of the vehicle was parked again (hereinafter “victim’s vehicle”).

(A) The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff paid mutual aid money of KRW 1,643,920 in the name of the victim F, who was on board the damaged vehicle during the period from July 6, 2018 to December 19, 2018; (b) KRW 2,731,782,510 in the name of the medical expenses and the amount agreed upon for the victim G; (c) KRW 2,407,290 in the name of the medical expenses and the amount agreed upon for the damaged vehicle; and (d) KRW 2,731,30 in the name of the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle; and (e) KRW 6,782,510 in the aggregate under the pretext of the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute; (d) evidence No.

2. Determination

A. The following facts and circumstances found by the evidence prior to the occurrence of the liability for damages, namely, ① the one lane between the first lane and the second lane of the instant road, have a blue-ray sign indicating that it is a bus exclusive lane, and thus, vehicles and horses were prohibited from entering the said one lane as well as from entering the said one lane; ② Nevertheless, the driver of the Defendant vehicle driving the Defendant vehicle, which is a bus at the time of the instant accident, driving the vehicle, and driving the vehicle, which is the bus at the time of the instant accident, and changing the course into the second lane; ③ at the time, the Plaintiff vehicle stops in the third lane of the instant road; and accordingly, the Plaintiff vehicle tried to change the two lanes into the upper left side of the instant vehicle.